top.jpg (2348 bytes) topright.jpg (703 bytes)
 

                     The Grand Junction Railway

Beginnings
Following the success of the Liverpool & Manchester Railway (which opened on
September 15th 1830) many schemes were proposed for the building of other
railways. The earlier problems due to lack of capital no longer applied and
investors were easy to find. Other towns and cities could see the benefits that
would come from better links between the nation's centres of commerce.
Birmingham businessman were planning a link to London, and the group of
financiers that were involved with the Liverpool & Manchester Railway could
see that Birmingham would be an ideal goal for expansion. In 1831 the
Warrington & Newton Railway opened and ran about 5 miles southwards from
Newton Junction at the centre of the Liverpool & Manchester Railway to
Warrington, and the River Mersey. This was considered to be an ideal starting
point for a route to Birmingham, and after much surveying, a route was found that
was practical and avoided conflicts with landowners.

 gjrmap.jpg (18491 bytes)      maptext.gif (1743 bytes)

The Bill for the Grand Junction Railway, which was named after the Newton
Le Willows junction, was passed in Parliament on May 6th 1833. This was
the same day on which the Bill for the London & Birmingham Railway was
passed and so work on the line now proceeded apace. 

   Coat of Arms.jpg (14696 bytes)       coatext.gif (3317 bytes)
       The coat of arms of the Railway

Construction
Three engineers were employed to share the engineering duties. They were
George Stephenson, who was in overall control, Joseph Locke, who looked
after the construction of the northern half, and John Rastrick who looked after
the construction of the southern half. This was an interesting time for Joseph
Locke as up until now he had worked for George Stephenson, and although
he had made quite a name for himself due to the excellent work that he did in
the construction of the Liverpool & Manchester Railway, he was still seen as
Stephenson's pupil, and so the deserved praise was given to Stephenson.

Locke was now his own man and was determined to prove himself in his own
right, and so he laboured vigorously in the construction of the line. Both
Stephenson and Rastrick however were involved in other projects and so their
commitment, and amount of time spent in the construction work was much less
than Joseph Locke. This caused problems between the engineers themselves
and the company directors, which led to Rastrick's resignation in September
1833, eventually followed by Stephenson's resignation on September 16th
1835. After Rastrick had left, Locke and Stephenson shared the engineering
duties with Locke concentrating on the northern part from Whitmore to
Warrington, and Stephenson on the southern part from Whitmore to
Birmingham. There was some bitterness between the two men as Stephenson
still considered Locke to be a junior, and not an equal, but Locke however,
revelled in his new task.

dutton.jpg (28801 bytes)  duttontext.gif (2614 bytes)
                     Dutton Viaduct

The next feature of interest was the Penkridge Viaduct which had 7 arches and
foundations that were buried in concrete to a depth of 70 feet. Immediately after
Wolverhampton station which was the highest point on the line, there was a deep
300 yard long cutting, followed by Summit Tunnel which at 186 yards long
carried the railway under Wolverhampton Road and the Wyrley & Essington
Canal. The last 14 miles was quite troublesome as it produced many totally
unexpected problems. The first was a small aqueduct carrying the Bentley Branch
of the Birmingham Canal across the Darlaston Green Cutting. A temporary canal
was built as a diversion while the aqueduct was constructed. It used a cast iron
liner to contain the water and when filled a severe leakage developed. The canal
had to be re-diverted so that the problem could be solved. This took a great deal
of time and was the last part of the construction work to be completed.

         Locke.jpg (8257 bytes)             locketext.gif (2565 bytes)
                    Joseph Locke

On the outskirts of Birmingham a detour was needed which required a further
Act of Parliament. The resident of Aston Hall was James Watt who was the
son of the famous engineer, and was bitterly opposed to the line passing through
his grounds. This late change to the route required the hasty design and
construction of several extra bridges, viaducts and embankments, which greatly
increased Locke's workload. The construction of the line in record time was a
great triumph for Locke. The average cost was less than the estimated £20,000
per mile, which was very cheap when compared with the cost of the London &
Birmingham Railway at £46,000 per mile.

Running
Considering that this was the first long-distance line in the world, its opening was a
very quiet affair. A train pulling 3 coaches and a mail coach set off from Liverpool,
and a similar one set off from Manchester. They met at Newton Junction where
both trains were combined and hauled southwards to Birmingham by the locomotive
Wildfire.

        loco1.jpg (11002 bytes)       locotext.gif (1327 bytes)
  An engine constructed at the Haig Foundry
          and delivered on Sept 20th 1838

In October 1840 the Grand Junction Railway took over the Crewe & Chester
Railway to use as a basis for a route to Ireland via Holyhead.

Amalgamation
It continued as a separate railway until an Act of Parliament was passed on July
16th 1846 which allowed the amalgamation of the Grand Junction Railway with
the London & Birmingham Railway and the Liverpool & Manchester Railway. 
The new company was called the London & North Western Railway Company
and became the countries largest railway. The amalgamation occurred because of
pressure from joint shareholders who had doubts about their investment in two
warring companies, and the individual companies themselves realised that they
could not realistically expect to retain their monopoly of the Manchester /
Liverpool to London route in the face of the increasing number of new railway
lines that were being proposed. This amalgamation must have surprised many
people at the time, because prior to this the two largest companies thoroughly
distrusted each other. The London & Birmingham Railway and Grand Junction
Railway violently quarrelled over the London & Birmingham's Trent Valley scheme,
and the Grand Junction's interest in a route to Shrewsbury. A year prior to the
amalgamation the London & Birmingham joined forces with the Manchester &
Birmingham Railway due to the latter's reliance on, and distrust of the Grand
Junction. In the event, each of the constituent parts was far more successful than it
had been before amalgamation, and the resulting company was one of the most
successful of the Victorian railway companies.

 
                                Curzon Street Terminus in Birmingham

      previous.gif (2467 bytes)                                                                     articles.gif (2509 bytes)

topedge.jpg (2214 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
middle.jpg (3642 bytes)
bottomedge.jpg (2182 bytes)
bottom.jpg (2382 bytes) bottomright.jpg (704 bytes)