Early Photographic Studios in Wolverhampton


A & G Taylor

Taylor's must have been one of the biggest chains of photographic studios. Some cards list two branches in London, 33 elsewhere in Britain and in 6 major cities of the USA. Their Wolverhampton branch was at Richmond Place, Penn Road. This later became the premises of J. F. Whitehouse (see below).

They also had a furry thing.  On the right it is creeping up on an unsuspecting child.

The Victoria Photo Co.

This firm was at 44 Waterloo Road South. Cartes issued by J. Will Evans (qv) say that his studio is "Late Victoria Photo Co".  This may be a simple change of name but it is more likely to represent a new owner.

The cdv to the right (kindly supplied by Carl Green) is in a remarkably similar style.  This studio may have decided that this was a winning formula.

A. J. Webber

   
His address is 41 Darlington Street, an area in which there were several photographers.

This is possibly a newlywed couple.  The studio is got up to look like a drawing room: a table with a book on it, a chinoiserie screen and a jardinere with a pot plant.

The photograph on the right taken in 1901 is of Mr. J. H. Boulton who was the uncle of the late historian Jim Boulton.

W. White

White was at 21 Broad Street and at 251 Wolverhampton Road, Heath Town.  One's guess is that either he had two studios or that he was at Broad Street first, then Heath Town.

He seems to have had furry things in both studios.  Here two Heath Town  children are about to fall prey to it.

This young lady wore white.  Photographers usually advised against it because their film could not deal with it.  The result is shown here.

Note the painted back cloth, showing a landscape with vaguely gothic elements in it; and the hideous rustic fence, of the materials and style much admired by Victorians and used excessively in their gardens and garden furniture.

The young gentleman on the right has plasterwork classical props and a classical back cloth.  His suit has a double breasted waistcoat, which has made it difficult to display his half Albert, which has had to be pinned on.  He wears boots with leather puttees.  But White appears to have had a well equipped studio.  

A remarkable photo.  The studio is littered with props, including a furry thing.  The family are sitting on some very basic chairs.  The man has a smart button hole - but his shoes are filthy.

White's address is given as 21 Broad Street. 

This photo (which is mounted on plain card and is not a cdv or cabinet photo) seems to show the same back cloth;  but the young lady's white summer dress has come out rather more successfully.

The stamp on the back indicates that White had had premises in Canal Street but was now in Broad Street.  The trick is that these are the same street - the old Canal Street was demolished in the 1870s and then re-named Broad Street. (Even earlier Canal Street had been Rotten Row).  Did White's premises survive the demolition?  And is this before or after he was at Heath Town - which is way outside the centre, whereas Broad Street was in the centre?

 

 

 

 

 

J. F. Whitehouse

Whitehouse was at Richmond Place, Penn Road and describes his firm as being "late A & G Taylor".  Presumably that chain had broken up.

The card back is in a very fashionable, Japanese influenced, aesthetic movement style.

The furry thing has got a firm grip on one child and is making for the other. 


Return to the beginning Proceed to the next page